Archive for the 'US Supreme Court' Category

OP-ED: The Real History of ‘Corporate Personhood’: Meet the …

The following is an excerpt ofA Jeffrey Clement’sA Corporations Are Not People: Why They Have More Rights Than You Do and What You Can Do About It .)A ClickA here A to order a copy.

The Real History of ‘Corporate Personhood’: Meet the Man to …

The following is an excerpt of Jeffrey Clement’s Corporations Are Not People: Why They Have More Rights Than You Do and What You Can Do About It .) Click here to order a copy.

Gauer Distinguished Lecture in Law and Public Policy

The Gauer Distinguished Lecture in Law and Public Policy is a major scholarly discourse by a national or world leader.

Antonin Scalia Bio

While the confrontational style of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Gregory “Nino” Scalia is widely regarded as one of his less appealing qualities, it underscores his clear sense of right and wrong.

Under the U.S. Supreme Court: Healthcare in the hands of an angry court

The bitter fight over healthcare is rolling toward the U.S. Supreme Court like a big wheel, destined for a probable resolution of the legal and constitutional debate, if not the larger political debate.

Campaign Finance Advocates Urge Supporters to Brace For Long Fight…

During a web seminar sponsored by the Business Ethics Network last week, campaign finance reform advocates were in agreement in offering a forecast of big money in the 2012 election cycle — and called on supporters to brace for a long fight.

Walter Berns’s Constitution

From a Constitution Day seminar in honor of Walter Berns American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research September 20, 2011 In America today, the Constitution has come to mean constitutional law.

Cheri Jacobus:

The liberal attempt to paint Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas as having a conflict of interest due to his wife’s work with a Tea Party group partisan Democrats hate is a bit too uncomfortable even for the best of the left – that is, retired Justic…

Quotas & Codes

Our system of racial preferences is obviously unfair and corrosive to honest discourse.

Racial Quotas, Speech Codes and the Thought Police

It’s racially discriminatory to prohibit racial discrimination. That’s the bottom line of a decision issued last Friday, just before the Fourth of July weekend, by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.